2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 1 | 25.3 | 1 | 6.3 | | 1 |
Alabama | SEC | 1 | 0 | 2 | 25.0 | 14 | 5.4 | | 2 |
USC | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 23.0 | 19 | 4.5 | | 8 |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 21.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | 7 |
Florida State | ACC | 1 | 0 | 5 | 20.8 | 19 | 4.5 | | 11 |
Georgia | SEC | 1 | 0 | 6 | 20.8 | 19 | 4.5 | | 10 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 1 | 0 | 7 | 20.6 | 19 | 4.5 | | 9 |
Texas A&M | SEC | 1 | 0 | 8 | 19.5 | 14 | 5.4 | | 16 |
Auburn | SEC | 1 | 0 | 9 | 18.9 | 14 | 5.4 | | 6 |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 17.9 | 19 | 4.5 | | 13 |
Baylor | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 17.8 | 1 | 6.3 | | 4 |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 17.6 | 1 | 6.3 | | 3 |
Mississippi | SEC | 0 | 0 | 13 | 17.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | 17 |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17.3 | 19 | 4.5 | | 19 |
LSU | SEC | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | 14 |
Florida | SEC | 1 | 0 | 16 | 16.8 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Clemson | ACC | 0 | 0 | 17 | 16.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | 12 |
Arkansas | SEC | 1 | 0 | 18 | 15.2 | 19 | 4.5 | | 18 |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 15.0 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 20 | 15.0 | 1 | 6.3 | | 5 |
Tennessee | SEC | 1 | 0 | 21 | 14.9 | 14 | 5.4 | | 23 |
Mississippi State | SEC | 1 | 0 | 22 | 14.3 | 1 | 6.3 | | 25 |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 0 | 0 | 23 | 12.1 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Missouri | SEC | 0 | 0 | 24 | 11.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | 21 |
South Carolina | SEC | 1 | 0 | 25 | 11.4 | 14 | 5.4 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 10.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 0 | 1 | 27 | 10.3 | 111 | -5.4 | | |
Washington | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 10.2 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 29 | 9.7 | 111 | -5.4 | | |
Utah | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 9.6 | 19 | 4.5 | | 24 |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 0 | 0 | 31 | 9.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | 15 |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 9.3 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 8.9 | 111 | -5.4 | | |
Duke | ACC | 1 | 0 | 34 | 8.8 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 35 | 8.4 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 0 | 1 | 36 | 8.2 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Michigan | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 37 | 7.5 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 7.0 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Illinois | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 39 | 6.9 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 40 | 6.7 | 19 | 4.5 | | 22 |
Brigham Young | Independent | 1 | 0 | 41 | 6.6 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Boise State | Mountain West | 1 | 0 | 42 | 6.5 | 19 | 4.5 | | 20 |
California | Pac 12 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 6.5 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 44 | 6.0 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 45 | 5.8 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 46 | 5.6 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 0 | 1 | 47 | 5.6 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 0 | 1 | 48 | 5.5 | 111 | -5.4 | | |
North Carolina State | ACC | 1 | 0 | 49 | 5.2 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 0 | 0 | 50 | 4.2 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Texas | Big 12 | 0 | 1 | 51 | 4.1 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 0 | 0 | 52 | 4.1 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Iowa | Big Ten | 0 | 0 | 53 | 3.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 0 | 0 | 54 | 3.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Kentucky | SEC | 1 | 0 | 55 | 3.1 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 3.1 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 0 | 0 | 57 | 2.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 2.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Temple | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 59 | 2.5 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 60 | 1.8 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 1.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 62 | 1.2 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Indiana | Big Ten | 0 | 0 | 63 | 1.0 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 0 | 0 | 64 | 0.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Memphis | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0.1 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Houston | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 66 | -0.8 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Syracuse | ACC | 0 | 0 | 67 | -1.1 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 0 | 1 | 68 | -2.2 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 69 | -2.2 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 70 | -2.4 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 0 | 0 | 71 | -2.7 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 0 | 72 | -2.7 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 73 | -3.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 0 | 0 | 74 | -3.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 75 | -3.8 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 76 | -4.0 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 77 | -4.2 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 78 | -4.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Toledo | Mid-American | 0 | 0 | 79 | -4.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 80 | -4.5 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 81 | -4.8 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 82 | -5.1 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 83 | -6.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Navy | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 84 | -6.7 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Utah State | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 85 | -6.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 86 | -6.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 87 | -7.6 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 0 | 0 | 88 | -7.7 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 1 | 0 | 89 | -8.2 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 0 | 0 | 90 | -8.2 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 0 | 91 | -8.3 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 92 | -8.9 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 93 | -9.1 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 94 | -9.3 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 1 | 0 | 95 | -9.6 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 96 | -9.7 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 97 | -10.4 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 0 | 0 | 98 | -10.7 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 99 | -11.2 | 19 | 4.5 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 100 | -11.5 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 101 | -11.6 | 111 | -5.4 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 102 | -11.8 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 103 | -12.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 104 | -12.4 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 0 | 0 | 105 | -12.7 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 106 | -12.8 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 107 | -13.2 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 0 | 0 | 108 | -13.2 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 0 | 0 | 109 | -13.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 0 | 110 | -14.2 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 0 | 111 | -14.4 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 112 | -14.5 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 113 | -14.6 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 114 | -14.7 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 0 | 0 | 115 | -15.0 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Army | Independent | 0 | 0 | 116 | -15.2 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 117 | -15.3 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 118 | -15.8 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 119 | -16.1 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 0 | 0 | 120 | -16.3 | 40 | 0.0 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 121 | -17.1 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 122 | -18.0 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 123 | -22.8 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 124 | -23.1 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 125 | -23.2 | 1 | 6.3 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 126 | -23.2 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 127 | -23.4 | 90 | -4.5 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 128 | -25.0 | 116 | -6.3 | | |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.