2015 College Football Ratings Summary |
College |
Conference |
W |
L |
P-Rank |
P-Rating |
R-Rank |
R-Rating |
CFP Rank |
AP Rank |
Ohio State | Big Ten | 2 | 0 | 1 | 25.7 | 4 | 10.2 | | 1 |
Alabama | SEC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 24.7 | 6 | 9.3 | | 2 |
USC | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 24.1 | 34 | 5.6 | | 6 |
Mississippi | SEC | 1 | 0 | 4 | 23.2 | 39 | 4.5 | | 15 |
Georgia | SEC | 2 | 0 | 5 | 20.3 | 16 | 7.9 | | 7 |
Notre Dame | Independent | 2 | 0 | 6 | 19.7 | 7 | 9.3 | | 8 |
Oklahoma | Big 12 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 19.4 | 3 | 10.3 | | 16 |
Texas A&M | SEC | 2 | 0 | 8 | 19.4 | 15 | 8.1 | | 17 |
Oregon | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 19.3 | 80 | -3.6 | | 12 |
Florida State | ACC | 2 | 0 | 10 | 19.2 | 22 | 7.4 | | 9 |
UCLA | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 19.0 | 23 | 7.3 | | 10 |
Baylor | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18.9 | 14 | 8.1 | | 5 |
Auburn | SEC | 1 | 0 | 13 | 17.8 | 47 | 4.1 | | 18 |
LSU | SEC | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17.7 | 11 | 8.7 | | 13 |
Texas Christian | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 17.4 | 9 | 8.7 | | 3 |
West Virginia | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 17.2 | 31 | 5.8 | | |
Georgia Tech | ACC | 1 | 0 | 17 | 16.3 | 49 | 3.3 | | 14 |
Clemson | ACC | 1 | 0 | 18 | 15.8 | 39 | 4.5 | | 11 |
Tennessee | SEC | 1 | 1 | 19 | 15.2 | 52 | 1.6 | | |
Wisconsin | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 20 | 15.0 | 64 | -0.1 | | 24 |
Michigan State | Big Ten | 2 | 0 | 21 | 14.4 | 21 | 7.8 | | 4 |
Miami (Fla.) | ACC | 1 | 0 | 22 | 13.9 | 32 | 5.8 | | |
Mississippi State | SEC | 1 | 1 | 23 | 13.7 | 59 | 0.0 | | |
Kansas State | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 13.4 | 32 | 5.8 | | |
Florida | SEC | 2 | 0 | 25 | 13.3 | 29 | 6.1 | | |
Nebraska | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 26 | 11.4 | 67 | -0.6 | | |
Michigan | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 27 | 10.8 | 57 | 0.7 | | |
Stanford | Pac 12 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 10.7 | 71 | -1.3 | | |
Washington | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 9.8 | 95 | -5.6 | | |
California | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 9.8 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Texas Tech | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 9.8 | 50 | 3.3 | | |
Arizona | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 8.9 | 18 | 7.9 | | 20 |
Arizona State | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 8.9 | 92 | -4.6 | | |
Brigham Young | Independent | 2 | 0 | 34 | 8.7 | 1 | 11.1 | | 19 |
Missouri | SEC | 1 | 0 | 35 | 8.7 | 35 | 5.6 | | 22 |
Arkansas | SEC | 1 | 1 | 36 | 8.7 | 73 | -2.2 | | |
Utah | Pac 12 | 2 | 0 | 37 | 8.7 | 13 | 8.5 | | 21 |
Virginia Tech | ACC | 0 | 1 | 38 | 8.4 | 93 | -5.0 | | |
South Carolina | SEC | 1 | 1 | 39 | 8.1 | 65 | -0.1 | | |
Memphis | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 40 | 8.0 | 24 | 6.3 | | |
Duke | ACC | 1 | 0 | 41 | 7.1 | 37 | 5.5 | | |
Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 7.0 | 27 | 6.3 | | 25 |
Illinois | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 43 | 6.9 | 45 | 4.5 | | |
Louisville | ACC | 0 | 2 | 44 | 6.9 | 126 | -9.4 | | |
Virginia | ACC | 0 | 2 | 45 | 6.7 | 110 | -7.0 | | |
Iowa | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 46 | 6.5 | 24 | 6.3 | | |
Kentucky | SEC | 2 | 0 | 47 | 6.4 | 2 | 10.4 | | |
Northwestern | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 48 | 6.2 | 36 | 5.6 | | 23 |
Minnesota | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 49 | 5.3 | 62 | 0.0 | | |
Boise State | Mountain West | 1 | 1 | 50 | 5.2 | 53 | 1.3 | | |
North Carolina State | ACC | 1 | 0 | 51 | 5.2 | 45 | 4.5 | | |
North Carolina | ACC | 0 | 1 | 52 | 4.5 | 112 | -7.4 | | |
Pittsburgh | ACC | 1 | 0 | 53 | 4.5 | 30 | 5.9 | | |
Temple | American Athletic | 2 | 0 | 54 | 4.2 | 5 | 9.8 | | |
Texas | Big 12 | 1 | 1 | 55 | 3.7 | 55 | 0.9 | | |
Houston | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 56 | 3.6 | 38 | 5.3 | | |
Washington State | Pac 12 | 1 | 0 | 57 | 3.4 | 24 | 6.3 | | |
Boston College | ACC | 0 | 0 | 58 | 3.3 | 60 | 0.0 | | |
Toledo | Mid-American | 1 | 0 | 59 | 2.1 | 20 | 7.9 | | |
Indiana | Big Ten | 1 | 0 | 60 | 1.4 | 28 | 6.3 | | |
Rutgers | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 61 | 1.0 | 105 | -6.3 | | |
Marshall | Conference USA | 1 | 1 | 62 | 0.9 | 56 | 0.9 | | |
East Carolina | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 63 | 0.8 | 83 | -4.1 | | |
Syracuse | ACC | 1 | 0 | 64 | 0.6 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Penn State | Big Ten | 1 | 1 | 65 | 0.5 | 54 | 1.0 | | |
Louisiana Tech | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 66 | 0.2 | 79 | -3.6 | | |
Cincinnati | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 67 | -1.1 | 94 | -5.1 | | |
Colorado | Pac 12 | 1 | 1 | 68 | -1.3 | 69 | -1.1 | | |
Vanderbilt | SEC | 0 | 2 | 69 | -1.6 | 118 | -8.7 | | |
South Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 1 | 70 | -1.7 | 82 | -3.7 | | |
Western Kentucky | Conference USA | 2 | 0 | 71 | -1.7 | 17 | 7.9 | | |
Oregon State | Pac 12 | 0 | 1 | 72 | -2.3 | 101 | -5.8 | | |
Colorado State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 73 | -3.3 | 119 | -8.7 | | |
Purdue | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 74 | -3.7 | 98 | -5.8 | | |
Utah State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 75 | -4.1 | 76 | -3.4 | | |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 76 | -4.1 | 74 | -2.9 | | |
Bowling Green State | Mid-American | 1 | 1 | 77 | -4.3 | 70 | -1.2 | | |
Ohio U. | Mid-American | 2 | 0 | 78 | -5.0 | 8 | 9.2 | | |
Wake Forest | ACC | 0 | 1 | 79 | -5.1 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Middle Tennessee State | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 80 | -5.3 | 75 | -3.2 | | |
Iowa State | Big 12 | 0 | 1 | 81 | -5.3 | 105 | -6.3 | | |
Air Force | Mountain West | 1 | 0 | 82 | -5.4 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Central Florida | American Athletic | 0 | 2 | 83 | -5.5 | 128 | -11.1 | | |
Maryland | Big Ten | 0 | 1 | 84 | -6.3 | 125 | -9.2 | | |
Navy | American Athletic | 0 | 0 | 85 | -6.7 | 60 | 0.0 | | |
Rice | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 86 | -7.4 | 97 | -5.8 | | |
San Diego State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 87 | -7.5 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Tulsa | American Athletic | 2 | 0 | 88 | -7.5 | 18 | 7.9 | | |
Hawaii | Mountain West | 1 | 1 | 89 | -7.6 | 51 | 2.4 | | |
Georgia Southern | Sun Belt | 1 | 1 | 90 | -7.9 | 68 | -0.8 | | |
Florida International | Conference USA | 1 | 1 | 91 | -8.3 | 58 | 0.6 | | |
Northern Illinois | Mid-American | 1 | 0 | 92 | -8.5 | 48 | 3.5 | | |
Arkansas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 2 | 93 | -8.9 | 117 | -8.3 | | |
Central Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 94 | -9.1 | 104 | -6.3 | | |
Florida Atlantic | Conference USA | 0 | 2 | 95 | -9.7 | 114 | -7.9 | | |
Nevada | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 96 | -10.2 | 99 | -5.8 | | |
Ball State | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 97 | -10.5 | 77 | -3.5 | | |
Kansas | Big 12 | 0 | 1 | 98 | -10.5 | 105 | -6.3 | | |
Southern Mississippi | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 99 | -10.6 | 121 | -8.7 | | |
Texas-San Antonio | Conference USA | 0 | 2 | 100 | -10.7 | 114 | -7.9 | | |
Western Michigan | Mid-American | 0 | 2 | 101 | -10.8 | 124 | -9.1 | | |
Fresno State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 102 | -12.7 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Appalachian State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 103 | -12.7 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Texas State | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 104 | -12.9 | 81 | -3.7 | | |
Connecticut | American Athletic | 1 | 0 | 105 | -13.0 | 39 | 4.5 | | |
Buffalo | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 106 | -13.1 | 96 | -5.7 | | |
Louisiana-Monroe | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 107 | -13.3 | 78 | -3.6 | | |
Southern Methodist | American Athletic | 1 | 1 | 108 | -13.8 | 72 | -1.5 | | |
Old Dominion | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 109 | -14.1 | 9 | 8.7 | | |
Army | Independent | 0 | 1 | 110 | -15.0 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
San Jose State | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 111 | -15.3 | 86 | -4.5 | | |
Akron | Mid-American | 0 | 2 | 112 | -15.4 | 113 | -7.5 | | |
Nevada-Las Vegas | Mountain West | 0 | 2 | 113 | -16.2 | 116 | -8.3 | | |
South Alabama | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 114 | -16.7 | 103 | -6.3 | | |
Eastern Michigan | Mid-American | 1 | 1 | 115 | -16.8 | 62 | 0.0 | | |
Troy | Sun Belt | 0 | 1 | 116 | -18.0 | 84 | -4.5 | | |
New Mexico | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 117 | -18.2 | 99 | -5.8 | | |
North Texas | Conference USA | 0 | 1 | 118 | -18.8 | 109 | -6.6 | | |
Tulane | American Athletic | 0 | 2 | 119 | -19.9 | 122 | -8.8 | | |
Wyoming | Mountain West | 0 | 1 | 120 | -20.9 | 119 | -8.7 | | |
Texas-El Paso | Conference USA | 0 | 2 | 121 | -21.1 | 123 | -8.9 | | |
Massachusetts | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 122 | -21.2 | 108 | -6.5 | | |
Idaho | Sun Belt | 0 | 2 | 123 | -21.6 | 111 | -7.3 | | |
Miami (Ohio) | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 124 | -22.2 | 102 | -6.1 | | |
North Carolina-Charlotte | Conference USA | 1 | 0 | 125 | -22.8 | 12 | 8.5 | | |
Kent State | Mid-American | 0 | 1 | 126 | -23.1 | 84 | -4.5 | | |
Georgia State | Sun Belt | 1 | 1 | 127 | -23.7 | 66 | -0.4 | | |
New Mexico State | Sun Belt | 0 | 2 | 128 | -25.6 | 127 | -10.1 | | |
College sports ratings use a somewhat less sophisticated version of the NFL model that does not use individual play data. Final scores and game location are the only data used. Unlike BCS computer ratings, point difference is factored rather than simply the outcome of the game. Instead of adjusting ratings for repeatability, both teams in each game are given equal responsibility for the result. Each team is assigned a normal probability distribution for quality such that the most likely scenario considering all games at once is optimized. In doing so, home field advantage is factored where applicable and strength of schedule is automatically accounted for. After 1 game, a team's rating will simply be their net points divided by 2. Past the first game, relative strength of opponents and how far a result is from the expected result begin to factor in. Like the NFL ratings, the first few weeks' ratings are unreliable but quickly become increasingly accurate thereafter. Subtracting one team's rating from another's will give an expected point spread should they play at a neutral site.